Lazarus Carpenter
I have lived in Wales for over twenty five years. Born in North Yorkshire, I am now an author, actor, musician and song writer, previously being a therapist, trainer and researcher, specialising in mental health. He was educated in Middlesbrough, Sheffield and Cambridge. With a fascination for Welsh History, I create worlds within worlds; magical, haunting, spirituality permeating sound moral codes of life. I live quietly with Debbie Eve (also my illustrator and our dog, Noodle in a small cottage surrounded by the beauty of the Brecon Beacons in the Valleys of South Wales.
“To be creative means to be in love with life. You can be creative only if you love life enough that you want to enhance its beauty.” Osho (Author of Courage)
Rajneesh, also known as Acharya Rajneesh, Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, and later as Osho, was an Indian godman, philosopher, mystic and founder of the Rajneesh movement. He was viewed as a controversial new religious movement leader during his life. An Indian rebel saint who spoke nothing but the truth, which everybody knows but never dared to speak. He was a professor of psychology. And later, the wanderer of spreading something beyond knowledge. Osho gave his discourses with such elan and depth; his power to preach was so unreal, so compelling, so transforming that if you listen to any of his discourses, you will always find him logically valid yet mystically beyond something.
He had reasons to back each and every rebellious act of his. From having 93 Rolls Royce cars to allowing free sex in his ashram, to having a massive ashram in Oregon and Poona, to touching each and every religion and mystic, every god and every spiritual person of all the bygone era in such detail, depth of understanding that one cannot but appreciate his astounding knowledge and insight. As reported by yellow media, Osho was probably one of the world’s most educated men and also the most dangerous man since Jesus Christ. He was denied a visa in more than 12 countries because America told them not to allow him. Osho was utterly harmless as he never did anything except speak. He called himself a guest of his followers, whom he always told not to follow him. He was stranger than fiction. His only message to humanity was to break the shackles of past mental slavery from conditionings and break the awe of religious gods and so-called saints. All he wanted was for people to be crazy enough to dance, sing, sit silently, and meditate. He knew that all humanity needs is meditation and peace of mind. His neo-sanyas teach people to be regular enough to love and appreciate nature.
Once upon a time, nestled deep within a magical forest, there lived a magnificent wolf named Orion. He possessed a sleek, silver coat that shimmered under the moonlight, and his piercing blue eyes sparkled like the stars in the night sky. But despite his extraordinary appearance, Orion carried a secret burden; he could not shed a single tear. While the other creatures of the forest revelled in the beauty of their emotions, Orion felt trapped within himself. His inability to cry made him an outcast, as his fellow wolves and woodland friends couldn’t understand his emotional plight. They believed tears to be a sign of vulnerability, but Orion yearned to experience the emotional release that tears could bring.
One day, as Orion wandered through a sunlit glade, he stumbled upon a wise old owl perched atop a moss-covered branch. The owl, Athena, possessed ancient wisdom and keen insight into matters of the heart. Sensing Orion’s sadness, she invited him to share his story. With a heavy heart, Orion poured out his tale of woe to Athena. He expressed his longing to cry, to release the emotions locked within him, and to feel a connection with his kindred spirits. Moved by his plight, Athena offered her guidance.
“Dear Orion,” Athena began, “the ability to cry goes beyond mere tears. It is the language of the heart, a gateway to understanding and compassion. But to embrace this gift, you must first uncover the source of your emotions.”
Together, Orion and Athena embarked on a quest to discover the key to unlocking Orion’s tears. They wandered through enchanted forests, climbed towering mountains, and crossed treacherous rivers. Along the way, they encountered various animals who shared their own stories of sorrow and joy, love and loss. As the journey unfolded, Orion began to understand that emotions were not a sign of weakness but rather an expression of his true self. He discovered that crying was not solely reserved for sadness but could also be a manifestation of happiness, empathy, and gratitude. Finally, deep within the heart of the forest, Orion faced his ultimate challenge, a mystical waterfall known as the “Tears of the Ancients.” It was said that those who stood before it with pure intentions would have their emotions released, allowing their tears to flow freely.
With trembling paws, Orion approached the waterfall. He called upon every emotion buried within him, allowing them to surge through his being. As his heart overflowed with a kaleidoscope of feelings, a single tear welled up in his eye, shimmering like a dewdrop. And then, with a sense of liberation, the tear trickled down Orion’s snout, splashing into the sacred waters below. In that instant, the floodgates burst open, and tears streamed down his face like a gentle rain, cleansing his soul and connecting him to the world around him. Word of Orion’s tearful transformation spread throughout the forest, and the animals rejoiced.
They recognized that emotions were not something to be feared but to be embraced and shared. Orion became a symbol of courage, teaching others to honour their feelings without shame. From that day forward, Orion’s tears became a gift, a reminder that expressing emotions is an essential part of the human experience. He roamed the forest, weaving tales of empathy and compassion, comforting those in need, and spreading the message that every tear carried within it the power to heal and unite. Children from far and wide would gather around Orion, eager to hear his stories and learn from his wisdom. They discovered that crying was not a sign of weakness but a testament to the strength and depth of their hearts.
Orion became a beloved character loved by many, guiding young ones through their own emotional journeys and encouraging them to embrace their feelings with open arms. As the forest flourished with newfound compassion and understanding, a remarkable transformation took place within Orion. With each tear shed, his heart grew lighter, and a radiant joy replaced the burden he had carried for so long. His once solitary existence transformed into a life filled with connection and meaning.
And so, the story of the wolf who could not cry, Orion, became a legend in the magical forest. It served as a reminder to all that emotions are a precious part of being alive, and that through embracing and expressing them, one can find solace, strength, and a profound sense of belonging to all that is and will ever be.
Sebastian Faulks is a British author known for his novels, short stories, and works of journalism. He was born on April 20, 1953, in Doncaster, England. Faulks studied English at Emmanuel College, Cambridge, where he developed a deep interest in literature.
Faulks gained widespread acclaim with his novel “Birdsong,” published in 1993, which explores the impact of World War I on personal lives and relationships. His writing often reflects themes of love, loss, and historical context, blending rich character development with vivid settings.
In addition to “Birdsong,” he has written several other notable works, including “Charlotte Gray,” “The Fatal Englishman,” and “Engleby.” Faulks is also recognized for his efforts in reviving the character of James Bond in “Devil May Care,” published in 2008, which was well-received by both fans and critics.
Throughout his career, Faulks has received various literary awards and honours, solidifying his reputation as a significant voice in contemporary British literature.
The relationship between Donald Trump and Elon Musk has generated significant discussion, particularly regarding the perceived dangers of their influence on global affairs. Some key points highlight these concerns for me: Both Trump and Musk are influential figures in their respective domains—politics and technology. Their partnership could lead to a concentration of power undermining democratic processes and accountability. Trump’s ability to sway public opinion through social media and Musk’s control over platforms like Twitter (now X) raises concerns about misinformation and the manipulation of narratives, potentially leading to societal polarization. Musk’s ventures in technology and space could be heavily influenced by Trump’s policies, which may prioritize specific industries or companies, leading to unequal economic opportunities and stifling competition.
Their relationship could affect international relations, particularly if policies favouring their interests lead to tensions with other countries. For example, Musk’s ambitions in space exploration and mineral exploitation on Earth and Trump’s nationalist approach could clash with global cooperation efforts. The merging of business interests and political influence can lead to ethical dilemmas, including conflicts of interest, where decisions may favour personal gains over the public good. While Musk is known for advocating sustainable technologies, Trump’s administration often rolled back environmental regulations. Their alliance may complicate efforts to address climate change effectively.
Their combined influence could challenge regulatory frameworks designed to oversee technology and business practices, potentially leading to abuses of power or harmful practices. The relationship between Trump and Musk poses potential risks that could impact the U.S. and global politics and economies.
Let us have a quick look at a forensic profile of both and further understand their individual make-up and what makes them tick.
Trump exhibits traits commonly associated with narcissism, including a strong sense of self-importance, a preoccupation with success, and a lack of empathy. He often seeks admiration and has a tendency to dominate conversations. His decision-making style is characterised by impulsivity and spontaneous comments on social media or public statements that seem unfiltered. Trump frequently engages in confrontational behaviour, especially towards critics and opponents. This could suggest a higher tolerance for conflict and a tendency to respond aggressively to perceived slights. He demonstrates a strong desire for control over his environment and the people around him, often leading to authoritative and sometimes authoritarian behaviour.
Trump’s communication style is characterised by simplicity, repetition, and emotional appeal, often employing hyperbole and slogans that resonate with his base. He tends to react defensively to criticism, resorting to personal attacks or dismissive comments about his critics, indicating a sensitivity to perceived threats to his self-image. There may be a significant difference between his public persona, which is often larger-than-life, and his private behaviours, which may include moments of insecurity or doubt.
Trump often frames discussions in terms of “us vs. them,” fostering a strong sense of loyalty among his supporters while vilifying opponents. Despite (or because of) his contentious style, Trump possesses a certain charisma that allows him to command attention and influence a substantial following. Some psychological assessments suggest that individuals with narcissistic tendencies may engage in manipulative behaviours to maintain their self-image and power. Interpersonal relationships may be strained due to tendencies towards self-centeredness and lack of genuine emotional connection.
A psychological forensic profile of Donald Trump reflects a complex interplay of traits and behaviours, with significant implications for his leadership style and interactions with others. Understanding these aspects can provide insight into his decision-making processes and the dynamics of his public and private life.
Elon Musk was born in South Africa and moved to the U.S. for his education. His entrepreneurial spirit emerged early, leading to ventures like Zip2, X.com (which became PayPal), and later Tesla and SpaceX, known for his role in revolutionizing the automotive industry with electric vehicles, advancing space technology with reusable rockets, and promoting renewable energy through SolarCity.
Musk is often characterized as a visionary, emphasizing his ability to think outside the box and pursue ambitious goals. His willingness to invest heavily in uncertain ventures (like SpaceX in its early days) indicates a high tolerance for risk. Musk’s public persona is marked by charisma, which he leverages to inspire and mobilize teams and followers. He is known for having an intense work ethic, often working long hours and expecting similar dedication from his employees. His communication can be polarizing. He uses platforms like Twitter to engage directly with the public, often leading to controversy. While he shows passion for his projects, examples of conflict with employees and public figures can suggest challenges in emotional balance.
Musk’s actions and statements often evoke strong reactions, and he is seen as a pioneer by some and a controversial figure by others. Frequent media appearances and social media activity keep him in the public eye, contributing to a mixed reputation. His stated goal is to advance human civilization through space exploration and sustainable energy. While driven by innovation, his ventures also aim at significant financial returns, evident in the growth of Tesla and SpaceX.
Critiques often target his management style, which some describe as demanding and abrasive. His controversial tweets have led to legal and financial repercussions, reflecting impulsivity. Elon Musk’s forensic profile reveals a complex individual characterized by innovation, charisma, and a relentless pursuit of ambitious goals, tempered by controversies and challenges in personal and professional domains. Understanding his profile requires acknowledging both his achievements and the criticisms he faces.
Put these two men together, and they become a formidable power not to be underestimated. Their combined ‘lack of control’, ‘impulsive ill thought out behaviour and actions’, ‘lack of respect for others’, ‘ambition’ and ‘lust for control’ are symptoms of looming disaster for the world, or are they?
Disclaimer:My thoughts should be approached with caution and are based on observable behaviour rather than clinical diagnoses, as a comprehensive evaluation would require direct interaction and assessment by presently practising mental health professionals.
Former and future President Donald Trump’s interest in Greenland, birthed in 2019. His motivations are due to various geopolitical, economic, and cultural aspects of Greenland as true today, if not more so than six years ago. What follows may be argued to be a fair analysis. However, I cannot help thinking that ‘global domination’ is his goal, and the recent autocratic threats by Trump are somewhat worrying for everybody. If he succeeds on his bid for Greenland, it would bring the end of NATO and US involvement in action against the climate crisis, and goodness knows what domino reactions on the economy, trade and world peace. This recent tirade from the incoming POTUS follows announced intentions for similar threatening actions in Canada and elsewhere. Is there no end to this man’s delusions?
Such actions for POTUS are that Greenland’s location is significant for military and strategic purposes, as it sits between North America and Europe. Control over Greenland could enhance U.S. Military presence in the Arctic region. Greenland is rich in natural resources, including minerals and potential oil reserves. Acquiring these resources could provide economic benefits and boost energy independence for the U.S. Greenland’s ice sheets are crucial for understanding climate change. Increased U.S. presence could enhance research opportunities and collaboration regarding environmental issues. A successful negotiation could strengthen U.S. relationships with Denmark and other Arctic nations, promoting cooperative governance in the region. Investment in Greenland could lead to economic development and infrastructure improvements, benefiting both the U.S. and the residents of Greenland.
However, Greenlandic people may view the idea of selling their land as colonialism or imperialism. This could lead to significant backlash and resentment towards the U.S. The proposal was greeted with scepticism and rejection by the Danish government, making it politically challenging and potentially damaging to U.S.-Denmark relations. Increased U.S. presence and resource extraction could lead to environmental degradation, threatening the unique ecosystems of Greenland. The logistics and costs associated with acquiring and maintaining Greenland could be substantial, raising questions about the feasibility of such a venture. The move has been viewed as aggressive by some nations, particularly those with interests in the Arctic, potentially escalating tensions in the region.
So, while there are potential strategic and economic advantages to Trump’s idea of U.S. control over Greenland, there are significant cultural, political, and environmental disadvantages. I am horrified by his rhetoric and not alone in feeling so. Of course, there could be an even wider agenda, especially related to oil and mineral exploitation. I feel a much deeper and darker agenda and I cannot help thinking POTUS and Elon Musk are plotting and scheming. What do you think?
Lazarus Carpenter - Author 